nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 03, v.42 1-11
消费者导向ESG驱动中国绿色供应链重塑
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目“工业技术进步方向与共同富裕实现:理论机制、效应识别及政策引导”(72373072); 江苏高校“青蓝工程”(苏教师函[2025]16号); 江苏省社会科学基金一般项目“全国统一大市场助推江苏工业新动能重塑的路径与对策研究”(23EYB012); 国家社会科学基金重大项目“创新链与产业链耦合的关键核心技术实现机理与突破路径研究”(22&ZD093)
邮箱(Email): zhengjh@nju.edu.cn;
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-03-02
出版时间: 2026-03-02
网络发布时间: 2026-03-02
移动端阅读
摘要:

ESG标准在推动企业可持续发展与绿色转型中具有重要制度功能,但以生产者导向的ESG标准过度依赖信息披露与资本市场约束,在评级分散与信息失真背景下面临治理效能递减的结构性约束。本文突破供给侧单向治理框架,将社会责任感消费者培育纳入ESG框架,阐明消费者导向的ESG评级标准(CESG)与生产者导向的评级标准(PESG)协同推动绿色供应链重塑的制度逻辑。分析表明,信号传递下的绿色溢价形成、声誉机制下的社会监督强化与制度约束下的违规成本提升,共同构成CESG由消费端驱动供应链绿色转型的逆向治理机制。作为分别从需求侧与供给侧驱动绿色供应链重构的治理体系,CESG与PESG在不同经济发展阶段呈现主导力量的动态转换与协同演进特征,二者通过正反馈的循环机制形成嵌入式双层治理结构,共同推动绿色供应链治理从单一合规模式向市场驱动与制度约束并行的综合治理模式演进。

Abstract:

ESG standards perform important institutional functions in promoting corporate sustainability and green transformation. However, producer-oriented ESG standards, which rely heavily on information disclosure and capital market discipline, face structural constraints that diminish governance effectiveness amid rating fragmentation and information distortion. This article moves beyond the one-way, supply-side governance framework by incorporating the cultivation of socially responsible consumers into the ESG architecture. It clarifies the institutional logic through which consumer-oriented ESG rating standards(CESG) and producer-oriented ESG rating standards(PESG) jointly drive the restructuring of green supply chains. The analysis shows that the formation of green premiums through signaling mechanisms, the strengthening of social supervision through reputation effects, and the increased cost of non-compliance under institutional constraints together constitute a reverse governance mechanism through which CESG, driven from the demand side, promotes green supply chain transformation. As governance systems that respectively drive green supply chain restructuring from the demand side and the supply side, CESG and PESG exhibit dynamic shifts in dominant forces and patterns of coordinated evolution across different stages of economic development. Through a positive feedback loop, the two systems form an embedded dual-layer governance structure, jointly advancing green supply chain governance from a single compliance-based model toward a comprehensive framework in which market-driven incentives and institutional constraints operate in parallel.

参考文献

[1] 方先明,胡丁.企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2023(2):91-106.

[2] 高波,申晨荣.数字技术创新驱动绿色消费升级的理论逻辑和实践路径[J].南京社会科学,2025(6):43-55.

[3] 罗俊,邹乐豪,王婧哲.碳标识背景下的绿色助推与低碳消费——基于在线平台的实验证据[J].经济学(季刊),2025(4):926-942.

[4] 毛其淋,王玥清.ESG的就业效应研究:来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2023(7):86-103.

[5] 邱牧远,殷红.生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2019(3):108-123.

[6] 宋科,徐蕾,李振,王芳.ESG投资能够促进银行创造流动性吗?——兼论经济政策不确定性的调节效应[J].金融研究,2022(2):61-79.

[7] 孙俊秀,谭伟杰,郭峰.中国主流ESG评级的再评估[J].财经研究,2024(5):4-18,78.

[8] 唐棣,金星晔.碳中和背景下ESG投资者行为及相关研究前沿:综述与扩展[J].经济研究,2023(9):190-208.

[9] 王建明,赵婧.数字时代信息嵌入式监管工具对线上绿色消费行为的推进效应——绿色购买场景模拟和监管工具设计实验[J].管理世界,2022(4):142-162.

[10] 王双进,田原,党莉莉.工业企业ESG责任履行、竞争战略与财务绩效[J].会计研究,2022(3):77-92.

[11] 肖红军,沈洪涛,周艳坤.客户企业数字化、供应商企业ESG表现与供应链可持续发展[J].经济研究,2024(3):54-73.

[12] 谢红军,吕雪.负责任的国际投资:ESG与中国OFDI[J].经济研究,2022(3):83-99.

[13] 严兵,程敏,王乃合.ESG绿色溢出、供应链传导与企业绿色创新[J].经济研究,2024(7):72-91.

[14] Coelho R,Jayantilal S,and Ferreira J J.The Impact of Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance:A Systematic Literature Review[J].Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,2023,30(4):1535-1560.

[15] Friend I,and Blume M.Measurement of Portfolio Performance Under Uncertainty[J].American Economic Review,1970,60(4):561-575.

[16] Friede G,Busch T,and Bassen A.ESG and Financial Performance:Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies[J].Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment,2015,5(4):210-233.

[17] Giannopoulos G,Kihle Fagernes R V,and Elmarzouky M,et al.The ESG Disclosure and the Financial Performance of Norwegian Listed Firms[J].Journal of Risk and Financial Management,2022,15(6):237.

[18] Kaufmann M,Andre P,and Köszegi B.Understanding Markets with Socially Responsible Consumers[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2024,139(3):1989-2035.

[19] Lucas R E.Econometric Policy Evaluation:A Critique[J].Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,1976,1:19-46.

[20] Rojo-Suárez J,and Alonso-Conde A B.Short-run and Long-run Effects of ESG Policies on Value Creation and the Cost of Equity of Firms[J].Economic Analysis and Policy,2023,77:599-616.

[21] Simnett R,Vanstraelen A,and Chua W F.Assurance on Sustainability Reports:An International Comparison[J].The Accounting Review,2009,84(3):937-967.

(1)数据来自Wind ESG数据库。

基本信息:

中图分类号:X322;F274

引用信息:

[1]郑江淮,沈春苗,孙荷洁.消费者导向ESG驱动中国绿色供应链重塑[J].消费经济,2026,42(03):1-11.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金面上项目“工业技术进步方向与共同富裕实现:理论机制、效应识别及政策引导”(72373072); 江苏高校“青蓝工程”(苏教师函[2025]16号); 江苏省社会科学基金一般项目“全国统一大市场助推江苏工业新动能重塑的路径与对策研究”(23EYB012); 国家社会科学基金重大项目“创新链与产业链耦合的关键核心技术实现机理与突破路径研究”(22&ZD093)

发布时间:

2026-03-02

出版时间:

2026-03-02

网络发布时间:

2026-03-02

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文